I have clients who work together on projects yet are employed by different entities. Can they combine, for example, their bookmarks? Just by sharing their password?

As an aside to the main question, this is a marvellous addition to Firefox’s functionality.

Thank you.

Some people may be OK with their password and bookmark data being out “in the cloud” but I like to keep tabs on exactly where mine is and how it’s used. Your privacy policies are great but I’d rather have it on a server that’s not a target for hackers.

Safari has a feature of syncing through Mobile ME service, and if you guys (which has the best browser experience) ought to same it would be a killer app.

As for Addon collector, Weave doesn’t interact with it right now, but it’s something we definitely want to get to in the future.

Thanks for using Weave.

Also, being a bit of a ‘control freak’, I like to have as much control as possible over certain information (that is, what information I disclose, which websites are allowed access to that information and which not, etc.), and my current OpenID provider allows such management.

As for the rest, Weave 0.4 is a definite improvement. Keep up the great work!

PS: is it possible to change the e-mail address with which I have signed up for Weave?

http://openidenabled.com/resources/openid-test/checkup/#

Incidentally, how is Weave supposed to interact with the new Addon Collector? Will Weave eventually include functionality for synchronizing extensions as well, and extension settings? That’s really the main other thing that I want out of Weave. Thanks!

Does Weave support turning *off* the identity support?

I’m trying yo map an address and I type:
map

And I get suggestions to do everything *except to map*!

This isn’t an isolated incident either, I try googling something by typing “google” and it asks if I want to add it to my google calender, gmail it or any of googles other services, except search?!

Same for wikipedia, I type “wikipedia” and it asks to look for wikipedia in wikicommons…

I’m sure you guys get the picture.

I just have Simpliquity, 0.1 Skin and Custom

As mentioned in our direct email exchange – all sorted, your entry is in the Design Challenge. :) Again my apologies for the problems.

Warm regards
-Pascal

Thanks for building such an awesome tool!

I submitted an entry at 10:51PM PST on june 21st and provided the required links to a Flikr gallery and a Youtube video. Is there a specific reason my entry is not included in the list of participants? I felt it was a strong concept. Please email me.

Presentation on YouTube tagged: “mozconcept”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zc6hRLhCKE

Mockups on Flickr as a collection tagged: “mozconcept”

http://www.flickr.com/photos/14252749@N07/sets/72157620077150313/

Not trying to grief anyone, just surprised that my entry was not accepted.

James

this is certainly a good idea – it just feels a bit over-engineered. To give you an idea – currently the votes are pretty evenly spread across the page (from top to bottom).

Warm regards,
-Pascal

If that’s the case, then why not sort randomly using the ip of the user as a key (and saving the ip as a cookie, in case the user gets a different ip). That way entries with a low alphabetic letter won’t have an advantage. Or select a number of random entries and display them at the top (5 or something like that), allowing a user to explore entries unbaised.

David

I am getting an error on browser opening: “Some verbs were not loaded as they are not compatible with parser 2″

Which means, I cannot use the email selected text / URLs – ‘help email’ comes up but I cannot access my gmail contacts as normal. I have been using ubiquity for quite a while now and have seen the gmail contact connectivity break before, I believe it was a sometime known issue but I’ve never had this ubiquity notification before.

E.g. By the time I have typed “wiki ubiquity” and hit the enter button nothing happens… no tab is opened. It seems like the reasoner is invoked every time a character is typed, but cannot present the result before I hit enter.

I posted my idea for the ubiquity user interface here: http://www.dvq.co.nz/web-design/mozilla-ubiquity-user-interface-mock-up/

Thank you for your suggestion.

The reason why we opted not to sort the results randomly is the simple fact that you make it really hard for someone to come back and find a specific entry – e.g. when you watch the first 20 entries and then want to watch some more after that.

The reason why we don’t sort by vote count is to avoid bias – there are numerous studies which show that when you present preliminary results to a voters, they will automatically go for the top scorers.

Which is the reason why we opted to sort the entries by a somewhat arbitrary order – alphabetically by name. :)

Best
-Pascal