<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better animations in Firefox 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/08/better-animations-in-firefox-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/08/better-animations-in-firefox-3/</link>
	<description>Exploring the Future of the Web</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 20:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: FF gold</title>
		<link>http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/08/better-animations-in-firefox-3/#comment-14250</link>
		<dc:creator>FF gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/08/better-animations-in-firefox-3/#comment-14250</guid>
		<description>FF Garbage: youre stupid. If you don't like FF, don't use it.

For me, FF is the best web browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FF Garbage: youre stupid. If you don&#8217;t like FF, don&#8217;t use it.</p>
<p>For me, FF is the best web browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FF Garbage</title>
		<link>http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/08/better-animations-in-firefox-3/#comment-14032</link>
		<dc:creator>FF Garbage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 09:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/08/better-animations-in-firefox-3/#comment-14032</guid>
		<description>Who gives a crap about animations!!! I would like a browser that doesn't eat all my ram and take 4 hours to start. What is with devs today? In Devs mind, "should I add pretty colors, or should make this run better" HMMMMM I think Ill add colors instead of making my software work well. Geshhh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who gives a crap about animations!!! I would like a browser that doesn&#8217;t eat all my ram and take 4 hours to start. What is with devs today? In Devs mind, &#8220;should I add pretty colors, or should make this run better&#8221; HMMMMM I think Ill add colors instead of making my software work well. Geshhh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hawaii</title>
		<link>http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/08/better-animations-in-firefox-3/#comment-13459</link>
		<dc:creator>Hawaii</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/08/better-animations-in-firefox-3/#comment-13459</guid>
		<description>I see these formats coming and going, and unless one of the large companies adopts it and begins growing it more, I don't see much of a future.  The idea and set up are great, don't get me wrong.  I just think these things need major support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see these formats coming and going, and unless one of the large companies adopts it and begins growing it more, I don&#8217;t see much of a future.  The idea and set up are great, don&#8217;t get me wrong.  I just think these things need major support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/08/better-animations-in-firefox-3/#comment-13418</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/08/better-animations-in-firefox-3/#comment-13418</guid>
		<description>We're thinking about using APNG for broadcast slide shows on digital radio - would really bring the ads to life... we will need editing tools to create the files and this is looking good... and open formats are really powerful for getting new ideas manufactured.  Keep up the development!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re thinking about using APNG for broadcast slide shows on digital radio - would really bring the ads to life&#8230; we will need editing tools to create the files and this is looking good&#8230; and open formats are really powerful for getting new ideas manufactured.  Keep up the development!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: /\/\arcio</title>
		<link>http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/08/better-animations-in-firefox-3/#comment-11676</link>
		<dc:creator>/\/\arcio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/08/better-animations-in-firefox-3/#comment-11676</guid>
		<description>Great work. Super interested in the SVG extensions feed. An approach where an external SVG editor talks with yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great work. Super interested in the SVG extensions feed. An approach where an external SVG editor talks with yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Dolske</title>
		<link>http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/08/better-animations-in-firefox-3/#comment-11070</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Dolske</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://labs.mozilla.com/2007/08/better-animations-in-firefox-3/#comment-11070</guid>
		<description>John: PNG is an open format that can be extended by anyone. It's unfortunate that the PNG group chose not to make APNG an official extension, but that doesn't make it wrong to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: PNG is an open format that can be extended by anyone. It&#8217;s unfortunate that the PNG group chose not to make APNG an official extension, but that doesn&#8217;t make it wrong to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
